Cooper Debate Team Member Login
About Awards Tourneys Resources Gallery Home

PF Topic Center

Active PF Resolution — Fall 2025

"Resolved: The benefits of the United States federal government's use of artificial intelligence for national security outweigh the harms."
✓ Pro Arguments
+AI dramatically improves threat detection and prevention capabilities
+Reduces human risk in intelligence operations
+Counter-terrorism benefits outweigh marginal privacy costs
+Allied nations coordinate more effectively through AI-shared intelligence
✗ Con Arguments
Mass surveillance creates chilling effects on civil liberties
Algorithmic bias leads to discriminatory enforcement
AI systems are vulnerable to adversarial manipulation
Autonomous weapons systems escalate risk of accidental conflict

💡 Full evidence files, briefs, and flows available in the Members Portal

Key Research Sources

🔍
NSDA Topic Guide

The official NSDA Public Forum topic analysis including definitions, background, and key stakeholders for the current resolution.

Visit NSDA →
📰
Government Sources

CISA, DNI, DOD, and Congressional Research Service reports on AI in national security — the gold standard for pro evidence.

CRS Reports →
🎓
Academic Journals

Peer-reviewed research on AI ethics, surveillance, civil liberties, and international security from major universities.

Google Scholar →

Debate Skills

✍️
Case Writing

A strong 4-minute constructive has 2–3 contentions, each with a clear claim, warrant, and impact. Lead with your strongest argument and pre-empt top counterarguments.

"Make your tag line a thesis statement, not a label."
💬
Crossfire

Use crossfire strategically: ask short, closed questions to expose contradictions. Never answer a question you haven't thought through. Control pace — don't let your opponent run the clock.

"Ask questions, don't make speeches."
🎯
Summary & Final Focus

In summary, extend 2–3 key issues with offense. Respond to the most damaging attacks. In Final Focus, crystalize 1–2 voting issues and explain why you win them.

"Tell the judge what to weigh and why your evidence is better."
📊
Impact Calculus

Compare arguments using magnitude (how big), probability (how likely), and timeframe (how soon). A clear calculus framing wins close rounds.

"Don't just win an argument — tell the judge why it matters MORE than theirs."
🗣️
Delivery

Speak conversationally in PF — judges want to understand you, not be impressed by speed. Eye contact, vocal variation, and clear signposting make you a more persuasive speaker.

"If the judge can't follow you, you're losing."

How We Train

⏱️
Timed Practice Rounds

We run full practice rounds weekly to build comfort with PF timing. Timers always running — no exceptions.

📝
Flow Practice

Flowing is a critical skill. We practice flowing pre-written speeches until every debater can flow at full speaking speed.

🎤
Video Review

We record and review practice rounds to identify speech habits, argument gaps, and crossfire patterns to improve.

Templates & Flows

📋
PF Case Template
Blank constructive template with contention headers, evidence blocks, and tag lines pre-formatted.
📊
Flow Sheet (PF Format)
4-column flow sheet formatted for PF: Constructive / Rebuttal / Summary / Final Focus.
📝
Evidence Card Template
Properly formatted evidence cards with source citation, date, tag line, and highlighted text fields.
🔍
Research Tracker
Spreadsheet for organizing sources by argument, side, and strength rating as you build your case.
⚖️
Impact Calculus Framework
A one-page guide for comparing impacts across magnitude, probability, timeframe, and reversibility.

Full template library available to members. Log in to access →